“Nepal-China Relations Should Not Mean Shifting Dependency from India to China”

Experts argues that Nepal should have clear agenda that serves our national interest in regard to Nepal-China cooperation instead of acting upon the agenda set by others, experts emphasized

June 15, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

“While deepening cooperation with China, Nepal should have substantial freedom of choice by ensuring that it does not become overly dependent,” pointed out Gyan Chandra Acharya former Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations, during an interaction program programme ‘Nepal-China relations and contours for economic cooperation.

Organized by South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics and Environment (SAWTEE), Acharya cautioned that greater Nepal-China relations should not, however, mean shifting dependency from India to China. “In the name of connectivity, if Nepal only builds infrastructure without corresponding improvement in productive capacity, then the roads and railways would become like a white elephant,” added Acharya. Although Nepal currently has comfortable debt level, caution should be taken to avoid the debt trap.

Rajan Bhattarai, member, Nepal-India Eminent Persons Group, also pointed out that Nepal needs to lay a foundation for developing mass-transit system referring to rail connectivity.

He also informed that the current government emphasis appears to be on grant modality, rather than loans, for the construction of prospective railway projects.

Former foreign affairs secretary Madhu Raman Acharya, however, opined that road to national prosperity cannot be on grant alone and thus alternative modalities of funding projects like concessional loans can be utilized provided that the projects offer substantial benefits to Nepal.

He asserted that Nepal should also contemplate upon factors that have been preventing implementation of the existing agreements between the two countries.

Dr. Posh Raj Pandey, Chairman, SAWTEE, emphasized that strategic independence must be ensured during the negotiations while reiterating that we should be careful not to shift dependency between neighbors.

Nepal should be open to Chinese investments in Renminbi as this might attract more Chinese investments, said GyanendraLalPradhan, FNCCI.

At the same time, he pointed out the need for balancing the relationship between India and China, for which Nepal could emulate Bangladesh as an example.Swatee Nepal China.jpg

Given the expertise of Chinese in railway engineering, transport infrastructure expert Dr.Surya Raj Acharya, pointed out that Trans-Himalayan railway is technically feasible but government’s lack of experts in the area has been a major obstacle.

Referring to PM KP Oli’s visit to China, Dr. Jagadish Chandra Pokharel, former Vice Chairperson of National Planning Commission, insisted that national consensus should be reflected in agreements that the two nations pursue.

The participants present in the discussion program had a consensus view that Nepal should have a clear agenda for its national interest and also echoed the view that agreements reached have to be followed through with effective and timely implementation. The roundtable brought together a cross-section of stakeholders, including policymakers, diplomats, scholars, and private-sector to identify priorities for Nepal in upcoming negotiations with China.

 Experts argue that Nepal should have clear agenda that serves our national interest in regard to Nepal-China cooperation instead of acting upon the agenda set by others, experts emphasized

 

 

More on News

The Latest

Latest Magazine

VOL 12 No.01, July 20, 2018 (Shrawan 04, 2075) Online Register Number: DOI 584/074-75

VOL 11 No.23, June 29-July 19,2018 (Ashad 15, 2075) Online Register Number: DOI 584/074-75

VOL.11, No.-22, June 15, 2018 (Ashad 01, 2075) Online Register Number: DOI 584/074-75

VOL.11, No.-21, May 25, 2018 (Jestha 11, 2075) Online Register Number: DOI 584/074-75